Cambridge IGCSE History - Depth Study option - Germany
Part 1
Weimar – 1918-1933
Weimar Constitution – main features, weaknesses, power of president, article 48, parties
What were the different parties in Weimar Republic:
SPD; Centre; DNVP; KPD; DVP.
What were the main features of the Weimar
Constitution?
e.g. It was a democracy. Everyone
21 yrs and over could vote. It was a
republic.
Every seven years, there was a vote for the president.
The president was the head of state and he appointed the chancellor, who
was the head of government.
Election results were decided by proportional representation.
The president had emergency power to dissolve the Reichstag and rule by
himself.
Proportional representation made it unlikely that any party would have
overall control, resulting in coalition governments.
They voted for the President who appointed the
Chancellor.
Weaknesses of the constitution:
·
Proportional representation
meant many parties , no party could gain majority to impose decisions
·
very slow and ineffective progress;
no quick decisions can be made
·
too much individual rights
to extremist groups
·
easily engineered with so
many parties;
·
under Article 48 the President
could rule by decree. This could possibly mean dictatorship
·
democratic government
structure was alien to the German people at the time
Power of president
Head of state; Commander-in-Chief, Article 48 emergency powers to
suspend individual rights and rule by decree; directly elected etc.
Article 48
Rule by decree in emergency, and maintain public order with
the use of armed forces, may suspend other Articles that protect individual
rights of citizens etc.
President could pass emergency bills without the consent of the Reichstag.
Chancellors, presidents (Hindenburg)
Presidents involvement:
Head of State; overruling powers. (1 – 2)
Level 2 – Describes aspects. Award an extra mark for each aspect described
in additional detail e.g. Ruled by decree; appointed Chancellors; declared a
State of Emergency; used Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution (expect details
of this Articles powers) etc. (2 – 4)
Resentment from the army/monarchists
Monarchists etc. lost power and influence. Many held key positions as
judges,
police, military, civil service. Did not want to be dominated by liberals,
socialists, Catholics, Jews etc. Objected to the way the treaty was made
and
also its terms. November criminals etc.
General political problems 1918-1920
Why were there so many political
extremists 1919-23 & many disturbances 1919-22
Political problems 1918-20
There were strikes of Berlin workers and demonstrations in 1918. Sailors took over Kiel.
Kaiser Wilhelm had fled the country.
There was a new democratic government.
There was the Kapp Putsch and the Spartacist rising in 1919.
In 1920 the Freikorps led by Kapp tried to set up a right wing government.
Communists thought there should be a revolution.
Why Political extremists?
One for the reason, one for explanation e.g. Extreme parties; impact of
Rev in Russia; paramilitary groups; Govt officials; judiciary; police; universities
etc supported by old style regime; Treaty etc.
Spartacist rising 1919 – describe events, who? Main
leaders
Describe events:
They were a communist group who formed the Spartacist League.
They wanted Germany to be governed like Russia after the Revolution of
Oct. 1917, with workers and soldiers councils in each town.
The leaders were Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht.
They tried to seize power in January 1919, occupying public buildings and
calling a general strike.
After two weeks, the revolution was defeated by
the Freikorps and the leaders were shot.
At the end of 1918 they renamed themselves the German Communist Party.
Freikorps 1919-20 – Describe activities
They put down Communist risings.
They were used by the government to protect borders against the Red Army.
They crushed the Spartacist League and murdered Liebknecht and Luxemburg
in Jan 1919.
In March 1919 they crushed strikes in the Ruhr, Rhineland and Saxony. And
in May, they defeated the Bavarian (Munich) Soviet Republic.
In March 1920 the Freikorps attempted to overthrow the government in the
Kapp Putsch, but failed.
In 1920 many of the Freikorps joined Hitler and
the NSDAP, including Ernst Roehm.
Why
Freikorps important
Used by government to suppress KPD; Berlin strike; Bavaria; brutality led
to left-wing distrust of Weimar; assassins; semblance of military; focus for
rightwing/ monarchists; Kapp Putsch – army and workers responses etc.
Kapp Putsch 1920 – Describe events & govt response
A coup by extreme right wing group. Leaders - Kapp and Luttwitz
aim was to recover land taken by the Treaty of Versailles.
A group of 5000 Freikorps attempted to march on Berlin and take power in Berlin.
Ministry of Defence only had 2 000 – army not keen to defend Republic.
Triumphant entry, new government proclaimed, Kapp Chancellor;
Kapp set himself up as head of a new government.
The army refused to stop Kapp. Ebert and his government fled from Berlin.
Workers went on a general strike and Berlin ground to a halt. City paralysed.
Kapp fled to Sweden. Freikorps disbanded
1923 – economic disaster, Ruhr
Why econ disaster by 1923
Germany had to send large quantities of goods to France and Belgium as
part of the
reparations payment. Reparations had not been paid. The Ruhr was occupied
by France.
French and Belgium troops entered the Ruhr and began to take what was owed
to
them in the form of raw materials and goods. The government ordered
passive resistance (strike). The French reacted harshly killing over 100
workers.
There were no goods to trade so the government printed more money to pay the striking workers. This made inflation worse. Prices rocketed and the money was worthless.
This was hyperinflation. Business went bankrupt. Money was worthless and peoples savings were wiped out.
There was an attempt by the Nazis to seize power. This was the Munich
Putsch.
There was the Munich Putsch with Hitler attempting to seize power from the
Weimar Republic. Because of its financial
difficulties Hitler believed the Republic was on the verge of collapse and he
tried to seize power. Although it failed the Putsch gave Hitler publicity.
What happened in Ruhr?
French reaction to non-payment of reparations. German passive resistance.
French violence towards Germans. Printing of money to compensate strikers led
to hyperinflation. [2–4]
Describe the occupation of the Ruhr in 1923.
Germany failed to pay its reparations. Troops from France and Belgium
entered the Ruhr.
Belgium and France wanted to take goods.
The government called for passive resistance with French and Belgian
troops.
German workers went on strike bringing production to a halt. A number of
strikers were shot.
Hyperinflation 1923 – why? How damage on Weimar?
Blame?
Why hyperinflation?
Inflationary problems existed before the invasion of the Ruhr by French
and
Belgian troop to secure reparations. Cost of war and loss of confidence in
economy. Passive Resistance by workers saw the government trying to pay workers
on strike. Printed money on a massive scale – unsupportable either by reserves
or income from Ruhr production etc.
Compared to Versailles:
Hyperinflation: Affected most Germans. Middle class lost money and
businesses;
savings; collapse of currency; some profited; Undermined confidence in
Weimar Republic etc. etc.
T of V. Hated because of terms re. territory, military, colonies, war
guilt and
reparations. This helped to cause hyperinflation through inability to pay
reparations, legalised the French and Belgian occupation of Ruhr, strike
and printing of money etc.
Was the hyperinflation a disaster or not?
YES. Increased resentment towards the government; strengthened the
right-wing;
greater disaster bitterness towards Versailles and the French; bartering;
food
shortages; savings worthless etc.
NO Made paying reparations cheaper;
led to American aid; brought Stresemann to power; Rentenmark helped economic
recovery; those in debt could pay off; at first, workers protected by union
wage agreements; industrialists benefited because of one union wage agreements
collapsed etc.
Munich Putsch
Describe the events of the Munich Putsch, 1923. [5]
What part did Hitler play in the
Munich Putsch? [5]
Why did
the Munich Putsch take place? [7]
What was Hitler
trying to achieve through the Munich Putsch? [5]
Why did Hitler
attempt the Munich Putsch? [7]
Hitler tried to overthrow the Weimar government.
He believed it was an opportune time to topple it. The government was
pre-occupied with the economic crisis and had just called off the passive
resistance in the Ruhr. There was discontent in Germany due to the effects of
hyperinflation. Many nationalists still hated the Treaty and were furious about
the Weimar government. With this in mind Hitler thought it was the right time
to seize power.
The Bavarian government was right-wing. Its leaders had been plotting
against the government. Hitler felt sure they would support a putsch. Hitler tried
to secure power and through his close relationship with WWI hero Ludendorff, he
believed that Ludendorff would persuade the German army to desert the
government and side with the Nazis.
Why was there a putsch in Munich in 1923 and why did
it fail? [6]
A protest about the Weimar governments handling of the
occupation of the Ruhr area.
Failed because the Bavarian troops/police would not
support the putsch,
dispersed easily by loyal troops, insufficient numbers
to achieve success etc.
NB Only one aspect attempted – Maximum of 4 marks.
[2–6]
Why was the Munich Putsch important for Hitler and the Nazi Party?
[7]
Hitler turned his trial into a propaganda success. Hitler used his trial
to make long speeches criticising the government and setting out his plans for
the future of Germany. This publicity turned him into a national figure. It
resulted in a small election gains for the Nazi Party in the 1924 Reichstag
elections.
He was able to gain the sympathy of the court and judge.
When in prison he began work on his book Mein Kampf which set out his main
beliefs and which clarified, and presented, his ideas about Germanys future (for
example ….).
He also had opportunity to consider future strategies, realising power
could be best achieved in Germany through legal means rather than an armed
uprising. Once in power they could destroy the system.
How
was Hitler affected by the Munich Putsch? [5]
What impact did the
failure of the Munich Putsch have on the Nazi Party? [5]
The leader of the Party, Hitler, was in prison.
The Partys newspaper in Munich was banned.
The Nazi Party was banned until 1925.
Hitler decided to win power by legal means, but the success of Stresemanns
policies
meant that there was little support for
extremists.
In what ways did Hitler change
his tactics following the Munich Putsch? [5]
He realised whilst in prison that the Nazis would not be able to change
power by force.
They would have to work within the democratic system but once in power
could destroy it. (2)
He began to rebuild the Nazi Party to make it acceptable to the
electorate.
He described the changes in his book Mein
Kampf.
Stresemann Era 1928-28
– main achievement (economic, political stability by 1929), methods? how far effective?
How did Stresemann solve the economic problems by 1928?
Rentenmark introduced, called off passive resistance and promised to pay
reparations, negotiated Dawes Plan etc.
How successful was the Weimar republic in dealing with Germanys problems
by 1928?
Successful:
Economic improvements – Hyperinflation & Passive Resistance ended. new currency
Economic improvements – Hyperinflation & Passive Resistance ended. new currency
Germany was accepted back into the international community.
Loans came from the USA. Political
stability still existed.
Ger restarted reparations, improving employment; allow foreign policy
initiatives which saw Germany again seen as trustworthy.
Hyperinflation was ended and confidence returned with the introduction of
a new
currency and reduction in government spending.
Stresemann negotiated the Dawes Plan. Between 1924-29 Germany received
over 25 billion marks in loans from the USA. With this German industry was
re-built.
In return for starting to pay reparations again the Germans, under the
Dawes Plan
received loans to encourage industry thus raising the standard of living
and resulted in the
French and Belgium troops leaving the Rhur in 1925.
By 1928 industrial production was higher than pre-war levels.
Germanys international position was improved. By the 1925 Locarno Pact
Germanys borders were resolved and Germany was admitted to the League of
Nations in 1926. This acceptance was reinforced in 1928 with the signing of the
Kellogg-Briand Pact against the use of war in foreign policy.
The greater freedom of the republic encouraged a cultural revival through
artists, writers,
architects and musicians. Berlin became a thriving centre of the arts.
Limited success:
To a great extent, Germanys recovery after 1923 was an illusion. The economic recovery
To a great extent, Germanys recovery after 1923 was an illusion. The economic recovery
depended on loans, while some sectors, such as agriculture, were in
serious trouble.
Following the Wall Street Crash, the USA recalled their loans and once
more Germany sank into economic depression. People blamed the Weimar and turned
to extreme groups with radical solutions.
Political stability was wafer thin. Stresemann was unable to please the
political extremists, who continued to threaten Germanys political stability
Actions caused tensions
with the extreme Right and Left; economic measures too heavily reliant on
foreign loans; inherent
weakness of Weimar constitution in the face of a world economic downturn.
Unemployment remained a
serious problem as the economy was not growing fast enough.
Farming suffered from
depression in the 1920s due to the fall in food prices. Farmers went into debt.
No one party was able to
secure a majority in the Reichstag.
Nationalists opposed Stresemanns
policies.
Extremist parties such as
the Nazis and Communists were determined to overthrow the Weimar Republic.
Economic success was the main achievement of the
Stresemann era?
He introduced a new currency, the Rentenmark. He ended inflation.
He helped the economy recover. Stresemann
worked with the USA.
Foreign affairs proved to be a success.
There was a cultural revival.
He ended hyperinflation and brought confidence back by introducing a new
currency and reducing government spending.
In return for starting to pay reparations again, the Germans, under the
Dawes
Plan, received loans to encourage industry therefore raising the standard
of living
and resulting in the French and Belgium troops leaving the Ruhr.
By 1928 industrial production was higher than pre-war levels.
Stresemann re-negotiated reparations under the Young Plan.
Economic prosperity was based largely on foreign loans. Exports were
falling and
yet huge sums were being spent on welfare and health care.
Many historians have thought that Stresemanns biggest achievement was
getting
Germany accepted back into the international community. He signed the
Locarno
Pact, joined the League of Nations and signed the Kellogg-Briand Pact
against the use of war.
A more open approach resulted in a revival in art and culture through
newspapers,
theatres, painters and literature.
It was American loans, not Stresemanns policies that let Germany
recover?
Loans - Dawes and Young Plans, enabled Germany to pay
reparations, increase confidence, expand industry jobs etc.
Policies – changed currency, encouraged international cooperation,
League of Nations entry, Locarno, Kellogg-Briand; US loans finally
undermined Germany etc. (2)
Foreign policy – greater success than in domestic
issues?
In 1922, Germany and the USSR re-established diplomatic relations in the T
of Rapallo.
Stresemann signed Locarno Pact in 1925. Germany confirmed its western
borders with Bel & Fr.
As a result of Locarno, Germany was accepted into the League of Nations in
1926 as it had
shown a responsible attitude.
In 1928 Germany was one of the signatories of the Kellogg-Briand Pact
which had stated
that countries would not go to war to settle international disputes.
Stresemann had worked closely with the Americans in securing loans under
the Dawes Plan
(1924) and reducing and extending the payment period of reparations in the
Young Plan (1929).
The early domestic problems of the Weimar Republic, such as the Spartacist
rising and the
Kapp Putsch, were overcome.
Stresemann ended hyperinflation and brought confidence back by introducing
a new currency and reducing government spending.
A more open approach resulted in a revival in art and culture through
newspapers, art and literature.
Economic prosperity was based largely on foreign loans. Exports were
falling and yet huge
sums were being spent on welfare and health
care.
The Nazis 1929-1933
Why did the support for the Nazis increase after the Wall Street Crash of 1929? [7] 2004s
The Great Depression brought
rising unemployment and poverty and the Weimar government seemed to have no
idea what to do except raise taxes, cut wages and unemployment benefit. Democracy
had failed them and they turned to extreme parties for solutions. The Nazis
offered to get people back to work on public works and later rearmament.
There was a rise in extremism
with the Nazis promising to get rid of the enemy within – Jews & communists.
This helped the party to gain significant numbers of seats in the Reichstag.
Their anti-communist stance was
very popular and they used propaganda, posters, newspapers, radio and mass
rallies to whip up fear and hatred and gain support.
By blaming the Jews, Hitler
offered a scapegoat for Germanys problems.
Why did the Nazi Party become popular between 1929 and 1932? [7] 2011, 2005 4, 2004, 2002
The Nazi Party was anti-communist.
It appealed to all those who feared what communism might bring, particularly
the industrialists, who feared a loss of their businesses. By dropping the
social elements of the Nazi program they won the support of the industrialists.
The promise to reverse the Treaty
of Versailles appealed to nationalists and those who
believed the stab in the back
theory. This also won the support of the German armed forces.
They promised to tackle
unemployment. With millions out of work because of the
Depression this attracted the support
of middle-class Germans.
Many women were attracted to the
party by its emphasis on family life and self-discipline.
The anti-Jewish campaign was
highly effective. Hitler told the people their problems
were caused by the Weimar republic, the
communists and especially the Jews. So Hitler
provided a scapegoat to help his
support.
Did the election results of 1930–33 prove people
supported Hitlers ideas and policies? [8] 2003
Arguments for:
·
Before 1930 the Nazis had only 12 seats.
During this time Hitler exploited the problems of the government holding huge
rallies and making speeches on tours around Germany. He promised to restore Germanys
economy. This resulted in an increase of support that gained 107 seats.
·
In July 1932 elections the Nazis became the
biggest party in the Reichstag with 230 seats.
·
Even von Papen and Hindenburg tried to use
Hitlers popularity to gain control for the Weimar government
Arguments against:
·
Communist support continued to increase
suggesting support elsewhere. Hitler had to suppress Communist Party.
·
Not everyone voted freely for Hitler. They
voted only after the Wall Street Crash of 1929, or out of fear of the
Communists
·
Whilst Nazi Party was largest seat holder,
it did not have an overall majority. Support slipped in November 1932, reducing
to 196 seats.
Nazis
increasing success in elections 1930-1933 was caused by use of violence.? [8] 2011 4
Violence - Speeches and propaganda
implied a struggle and violence; SA parades and
destruction of other parties meetings; military uniforms;
constant calls to arms
and threats; atmosphere intimidating; Nazis violent but
got support because
they said they could stop the violence; Reichstag Fire
etc.
Others - Polarisation of support Communists/Nazis in
economic crisis; previous
Chancellors had failed to deal with the economic crisis;
Hitler had already
done well against Hindenburg in the Presidential
election; seemed to be no
alternative; genuine support for
the Party and its policies etc.
How
significant was Hitlers role in increasing the popularity of the Nazi Party 1929 -1932? [8]
At that time Hitler was attempting
to become President and in March 1932 challenged Hindenburg. He carried out an
election campaign and won 13.4 million votes. This campaign provided
much-needed publicity for Nazi ideas. This support was added to in the Reichstag
elections of July 1932 which proved to be a triumph for the Nazis who gained
230 seats.
The popularity of Hitler at that
time ensured the Nazis were the largest party despite a loss in the share of
votes.
Hitler persuaded powerful
industrialists that he would prevent the Communists from taking power and would
restore the German economy. He built up a cult with the people through his
speech-making skills with his campaigns being focused around his personality.
BUT
Great Depression destroyed the
whole basis of the German economy and German trade suffered. Many were prepared
to listen to the promises of extremist parties such as the Nazis.
The Depression brought about a
political crisis which led to the fall of democracy. At the same time it
highlighted a weakness in the Constitution. The leading parties fell out and
had to ask President Hindenburg to use Article 48. This was agreed and laws
were passed without the say of the Reichstag. This ended democracy and aided
the Nazi Party who did not believe in it.
Using every method of propaganda
Goebbels got the Nazi message to every town and home in Germany. This
propaganda was used with good effect to whip up fear and hatred of the
Communists and increase the number of seats gained in elections.
In what ways did Hitler change
his tactics following the Munich
Putsch? [5]
He realised whilst in prison that
the Nazis would not be able to change power by force.
They would have to work within
the democratic system but once in power could destroy that
system. (2) He began to rebuild
the Nazi Party to make it acceptable
1920s - Nazis' limited success
What methods did the Nazis use to gain support in elections before 1933? [5]
They promised employment. promised to deal with those responsible for Germanys problems
One leader – traditional values. They issued posters and pamphlets.
The SA and SS gave the impression of discipline and order.
They organised soup kitchens and hostels for the unemployed.
Why did the Nazi Party have little success before 1930?
The Party had extremist ideas, nationalism, anti-Semitism which were unacceptable to many.
They set up the SA and its violent tactics were notorious.
The Munich Putsch of 1923 resulted in Hitler being imprisoned, its newspaper being
banned and the party being banned. When the ban was lifted in 1925, Hitler made a speech
which was so critical of the government that he was banned from speeches for another two years.
Stresemann’s economic and foreign policies were so successful that Germany returned to political and economic stability as hyperinflation ended. People gave very little support for extremist parties. In 1928 the Nazi Party had 12 seats in the Reichstag and was only the eighth largest party.
Most industrial workers tended to support left wing parties such as the communists. Parties
like the communists often attacked Nazi Party meetings.
As Munich Putsch revealed, the Nazis did not have the support of either the police or the Army.
How significant was Hitler’s role in increasing popularity of the Nazis 1929-32?
At that time Hitler was attempting to become President and in March 1932 challenged
Hindenburg. He carried out an election campaign and won 13.4 million votes. This
campaign provided much-needed publicity for Nazi ideas. This support was added to in the
Reichstag elections of July 1932 which proved to be a triumph for the Nazis who gained 230 seats.
The failure to appoint Hitler as Chancellor at the end of 1932 resulted in the threat of a Nazi
uprising if von Papen remained in post and the popularity of Hitler at that time ensured the
Nazis were the largest party despite a loss in the share of votes.
Hitler persuaded powerful industrialists that he would prevent the Communists from taking
power and would restore the German economy. He built up a cult with the people through
his speech-making skills with his campaigns being focused around his personality.
OR
The Great Depression destroyed the whole basis of the German economy and German trade suffered. Many Germans were prepared to listen to the promises of extremist parties such as the Nazis.
The Depression brought about a political crisis which led to the fall of democracy. At the same time it highlighted a weakness in the Constitution. The leading parties fell out and had to ask President Hindenburg to use Article 48. This was agreed and laws were passed without the say of the Reichstag. This ended democracy and aided the Nazi Party who did not believe in it.
Using every method of propaganda Goebbels got the Nazi message to every town and
home in Germany. This propaganda was used with good effect to whip up fear and hatred of
the Communists and increase the number of seats gained in elections.
Why economic disaster by 1933
Wall Street Crash; US loans recalled; banks collapsed; loss of export markets;
government cut expenditure; massive unemployment; wages cut; fears of a
return to 1923 conditions etc. (2 – 6)
Describe the ideas and policies of the Nazi Party in the 1920s. [5] 2004w
They used violence / extremist. Anti-Semitic. The 25 points. Restore to former glory.
It was opposed to the Weimar Republic. Wanted to overthrow the Treaty of Versailles.
To gain more territory for its people in a single solution for the German problems.
Belief in the use of rallies, parades and marching songs. Deal strongly with opponents (SA).
There was a fear of communism. Dictatorship/one party state.
Hitler’s
rise as Chancellor 1933
Why was Hitler able to become Chancellor in 1933? [7]
Why did events from 1930 to 1932 result in Hitler becoming Chancellor? [7] 2010, 2007
By 1930 the old hostility to the Weimar Republic
had resurfaced. With the Depression and the death of Stresemann, Germany had
once again sunk into economic depression.
People began to turn to those
parties that offered a radical solution – the Nazis and the Communists.
The government coalition led by
Müller could not agree on how to deal with the effects of the Depression and in
1930 he resigned, to be succeeded by Brüning. He did not have a majority and
had to rely on Hindenburg. This resulted in fewer meetings of the Reichstag and
Hindenburg issuing over a number of presidential decrees.
During this time Hitler exploited
the governments problems by holding huge rallies and promises to restore the
economy. In the elections of September 1930 the Nazis won 107 seats and in July
1932 they won 230 seats.
In the Presidential elections of
March 1932, Hitler challenged Hindenburg and his position was strengthened by
winning 13.4 million votes.
Bruning was sacked as he failed
to deal with the economic problems. He was replaced by Papen. In the July 1932
elections he hoped to strengthen his position in the Reichstag but the Nazis
became the largest single party with 230 seats. Hitler refused to co-operate
with Papen.
Hitler suffered a setback in
November 1932 as they only secured 196 seats. But even so, there was a fear of
Communist uprisings if Papen remained in office. Schleicher was made Chancellor
but failed to win support in the Reichstag. Papen refused to return but thought
that if Hitler was appointed they would be able to control him by packing the
cabinet with conservative allies.
Germany was hit by
Depression. The election results began
to favour the Nazi Party.
Those appointed chancellor failed
to gain support in the Reichstag. Papen was mistaken about Hitler.
To
what extent was Hitlers appointment as Chancellor in 1933 a result of his popularity? [8]
The popularity of the Nazi Party’s ideas was the most important reason for
Hitler’s appointment as chancellor? [8]
The Depression/Wall St Crash was the most important reason for Hitler’s
appointment as chancellor? [8]
actions of Papen and Hindenburg responsible for Hitler becoming
Chancellor? [8] 2010, 2006
weakness of Weimar
Government enabled Hitler to become Chancellor?
[8] 2009
Hitler:
Hitler was a great orator. Hitler made good use of propaganda.
Hitler became popular with
industrialists. Hitler had attractive
policies.
Hitler was a skilled public
speaker and proved to be very persuasive. For the difficult times, he had
attractive policies for the German people. Joseph Goebbels made effective use
of propaganda and helped to portray Hitler as a commanding figure who had the
answers to Germanys problems.
Hitler was popular amongst many
industrialists, who feared that a communist government
would take over their businesses.
Hitler was popular amongst
military leaders as he advocated strengthening of German armed forces.
Hitler was admired by ordinary
Germans because his policies were becoming popular. He wanted to abolish the
Treaty of Versailles; he was anti-communist and he had ideas as to how the
unemployment problem could be tackled.
Hitler himself was a very powerful
and skilled speaker. His performances at rallies were very persuasive.
Joseph Goebbels organised Hitler’s
election campaigns and was a master of propaganda.
His organisation of rallies and
posters helped to highlight Hitler’s appeal.
Wall Street Crash/Great Depression
The death of Stresemann and the
Wall Street Crash in 1929 caused an economic crisis for Germany. People began
to lose faith in parliamentary democracy and turned to those offering a radical
solution.
There were a series of chancellors
between 1929 and 1933 – Muller, Bruning, von Papen and von Schleicher – none of
them were able to tackle the underlying problems. Increasingly, Hindenburg ruled
by presidential decree as the Reichstag met less and less.
In difficult economic times, the
Nazi Party programme proved to be very attractive to voters. The Nazis believed
the Treaty of Versailles had to be abolished because it brought great misery on
Germany. In particular, the heavy reparations weakened Germany’s economy.
At a time of massive unemployment,
the Nazis programme of work was appealing. A huge range of jobs were outlined
from the re-building of the armed forces to the building of homes and motorways.
Many Nazis blamed the Jews for
Germany’s problems from the loss of the First world War to the Depression. It
was appealing to have someone to blame. Jews throughout Europe were not popular
and the Nazis played on this factor.
The Great Depression destroyed the
whole basis of the German economy and German trade suffered. Many Germans were
prepared to listen to the promises of extremists such as the Nazis.
Disillusionment with democracy : The
failure of successive chancellors to deal with the effects of the Depression
made Hitler’s appointment a possibility. Bruning, Schleicher and von Papen all
failed to command majorities in the Reichstag and resulted in Hindenburg ruling
by decree.
Hitler promised to deal with the
problems of the economy and the Depression as the German people wanted radical
solutions to their problems.
Previous chancellors to Hitler
could not command a majority. So Hindenburg offered Hitler the position.
Between 1930 and 1932, Hitler
exploited the governments problems by holding huge rallies at which he promised
to restore Germanys economy, such as by huge employment schemes and destroying
the Treaty of Versailles. This enabled the Nazi Party to win 230 seats in July
1932, becoming the largest party in the Reichstag.
Weaknesses of the Weimar
Between 1930 and 1932, no one
party had enough support to form a strong government and Hindenburg ruled by
decree. He appointed his own chancellors. Bruning, von Papen and Schleicher all
failed to cope with the crisis and The Weimar politicians could not
cope with the effects of the depression. No one party had enough support and
President Hindenburg ruled by decree. As a result of the July 1932 elections
the Nazis became the largest party. They could not command a majority
in the Reichstag.
Von Papen persuaded Hindenburg to
appoint Hitler Chancellor.
The elite groups considered it
better for Germany
to have a strong, authoritarian government rather than the President acting
alone. These groups preferred the Nazi Party rather than the communists.
In Jan 1933, Hindenburg and von
Papen thought Hitler should be appointed and that they would be able to control
him.
Also: Constitutional problems
created coalitions, thus weak government; had signed the Versailles Treaty;
November criminals; death of Stresemann and Great Depression exacerbated
weaknesses etc.
Other factors
The SA and terror tactics
Why was Hindenburg’s death in 1934 important to Hitler? [6] 2003 4
Decisive handling of SA persuaded
army to support Hitler becoming President as well as Chancellor, oath of
allegiance, no opposition, Hitler became the only political personality seen as
capable of leading Germany forward.
From Chancellor to Dictator (Fuhrer) 1933-1934
*Note: This section can be under 'Weimar' (question #9) or 'Nazi' (#10)
Reichstag Fire (Feb 1933)
Describe
the Reichstag Fire and its effects. [4] 2009s 4
Was
it the work of Van der Lubbe or of the Nazis? Nazis banned Communists and
Hindenburg signed Decree for protection of the people and state. Freedom of
speech and assembly etc suspended.
Thousands
of communists. arrested. Election of March 5 1933 etc.
Enabling Law (March 1933)
What
was the Enabling Law of March 1933? [5] 2009,
2009 4, 2008 4, 2003
A
single law providing the constitutional basis for Hitlers dictatorship, Only
SDP voted against. Communists outlawed by this time. Act lasted four years and
was renewed in 1937, 1939 and 1943.
It
effectively made Hitler a dictator Germany by giving Hitler power to make laws
without the Reichstag. It removed parliamentary democracy.
The
law gave Hitler power to crush political opposition.
What
power did the Enabling Act give to Hitler?
[2] 2003 4
rule
by decree, dictatorial powers, no need to consult Reichstag, make alliances.
Night of Long Knives (June 1934)
Röhm
Why was Ernst Röhm important to the Nazis before 1934? [6] 2010w 4
Military / Freikorps background; Quasi-socialist image; close to Hitler;
Munich / imprisonment; Aided the rebuild of the Party; Chief of Staff of SA from 1931; Destroying opposition in 1932/3 elections; Disliked by other leaders; His wish to unite SA and Wehrmacht made him a dangerous person for Hitler; Wanted more left wing policies which would upset Hitlers financial backers
Why was Röhm a threat to Hitler? [7] 2008s
Röhm wanted power for himself and the SA. Röhm was a threat to Hitlers dictatorship.
Röhm wanted to merge the SA with the army and take control. Hitler needed the support of the army to carry out his plans. This was a threat to his control.
Röhm wanted a second revolution to put socialist policies into practice. Many industrialists thought this programme was like Communism. Hitler did not want to upset them.
Hitler no longer needed the SA as he had the SS, his own personal bodyguard. He was embarrassed by the continued violence of the SA.
Himmler and Goering convinced Hitler that Röhm was a threat to Hitlers power. Really they were jealous of Röhms power.
Describe
the events of the Night of the Long Knives. [5] 2008, 2006, 2003 4, 2002
On 30
June 1934 Hitler arrived at a hotel in Bad Wiessee with heavily armed SS.
He
informed Röhm and other SA leaders they were under arrest.
The
SA leaders were taken to Munich where they were shot.
Over
the next four days other leaders were arrested by the SS and shot.
Up to
200 were killed including von Schleicher.
Why
did the Nazis carry out the Night of the Long Knives? [7] 2009, 2009 4,
Rohm
was a challenge to Hitler. Hitler was
concerned about the SA.
To
arrest Rohm. To please the Army
leaders. Rohms views were too
left-wing. The SA had lost their
purpose.
Hitler
was embarrassed by the continued violence of the SA.
The
SA had become a threat to Hitler and SA leaders wanted pay and position
for
previous services. SA wanted to merge with the Army with Rohm at its head.
SA
anti-capitalist and left wing. Removal of SA would gain Hitler the loyalty of
the army etc.
Rohm,
leader of the SA, had left-wing views which would offend the businessmen that
Hitler now wanted to work with.
Rohm
wanted to merge the SA into the German army and for him to have control, but
Hitler feared this would lose him the armys support.
When
Hitler ordered the SS to arrest and murder the leaders of the SA, including Rohm,
using the excuse that Rohm was about to plan a revolution, Hitler had removed a
potential threat to his overall control.
Hitler
removed rivals outside the SA, like von Schleicher and Gregor Strasser, and therefore
tightened his control.
Hitler
no longer needed the SA as he had the SS, his own personal bodyguard.
Paper
4 2005w
The
most important reason for Hitler…1933-1934 was the Reichstag Fire.? [8] 2010 x2, 2005 4
The Reichstag Fire was blamed on
the Communists.
The Night of the Long Knives
removed opposition.
Hitler banned political opponents
and newspapers.
In February 1933, the Reichstag
building was destroyed by fire and Hitler used the fire
to intensify anti-communist
hysteria.
Hindenburg passed an emergency
decree allowing Hitler to arrest communist leaders
and preventing the Nazis political
opponents from holding public meetings.
In the Reichstag elections, the
Nazis won 288 seats and in addition he banned the
communist deputies. This gave
Hitler enough votes to pass the Enabling Law, which
gave Hitler power to make laws
without referring to the Reichstag.
The SA had become a major problem.
Rohm, leader of the SA, had left wing views which would offend businessmen, the
very people Hitler wanted to work with. Rohm also wanted to merge the SA into
the German army and for him to have control. Hitler feared this would lose him
the army’s support.
In June 1934, Hitler ordered the
SS to arrest the leaders of the SA. Rohm was killed as was von Schleicher. The
Enabling Act made Hitler dictator over Germany and in July 1934 he banned
all other political parties.
In Aug 1934 Hindenburg died. His
death allowed Hitler to declare himself Fuhrer. The
army was to swear an oath of loyalty
to Hitler. He had achieved total power.
Reichstag Fire was more important than Night
of the Long Knives in enabling Hitler to establish control over Germany . How
far do you agree? [8] 2010w
Reichstag Fire more important than Enabling
Act in allowing Hitler to consolidate power? [8]
Enabling Act was the
most important factor…becoming the Führer in 1934. [8] 2010 4
How important was the Reichstag Fire?
The fire occurred just before
the March 1933 election. Hitler turned this to his advantage and blamed the
Communists, stating it was a Communist uprising.
The left was the Nazis’ biggest
enemies and the arrest of Van der Lubbe gave Hitler evidence that the
Communists were plotting against his government. On the night of the fire, 4000
leading Communists were arrested and imprisoned to remove the threat.
To increase Nazi control, the
next day Hitler persuaded the President to pass an emergency decree
suspending all civil liberties including freedom of speech. It gave the Nazis
powers to search houses and detain people without trial. He used these
powers to intimidate voters.
In the election, the Nazis won
their largest share of the votes and got 288 seats. This helped him to
pass the Enabling Act later.
But: Hitler still did not have an
overall majority of seats. His power was still restricted by…
How important was the Enabling Act?
Hitler brought about his first
change to the Constitution by introducing the Enabling Act. This was the legal
foundation of his dictatorship because it meant he could now pass laws without
the consent of the Reichstag for the next four years.
Gave him power to arrest enemies
(Communist Party already banned); He later abolished the
parliaments.
He arranged for the arrest of
trade union officials and merged the unions into a German Labour Front. This
meant the Nazis would not be threatened by strikes or other union activities.
In July 1933, Hitler banned all
other parties, making the Nazis the only party allowed in the state.
In Aug 1934 Hindenburg died. His
death, together with the Enabling Act, allowed Hitler to declare himself Führer
of Germany. The army was made to swear an oath of loyalty to Hitler. He had
achieved total power.
But…
How important was the Night of the Long Knives?
A significant threat to Hitler
came from within the Nazi party. The SA had become a major problem. Röhm,
leader of the SA, had left-wing views which would offend the businessmen that
Hitler now wanted to work with. Röhm also wanted to merge the SA into the
German army and for him to have control, but Hitler feared this would lose him
the army’s support.
On 30 June 1934 Hitler ordered
the SS to arrest and murder the leaders of the SA. Hundreds were killed
including Röhm and von Schleicher. Hitler used the excuse that Röhm was
planning a revolution to justify his actions in removing a potential threat to
his overall control.
Others
- Night of the Long Knives; Death of Hindenburg; Allegiance of the Wehrmacht;
Abolition of unions; improvement in jobs and prosperity
The
most important reason why Hitler was able to strengthen his control over Germany during the
period 1933–34 was the “Night of the
Long Knives”. How far do you agree? [8] s2007
How
far did Hitler use legal means to
become Fuhrer? [8] 2009w 4, 2005s 4
Legal Held elections; made laws
to gain power – Enabling Act; appointment as Chancellor, invited by Hindenburg;
proper party etc. death of Hindenburg
Not legal - Terror and violence;
role of SA; attitudes and some early policies regarding
minorities; propaganda; perhaps
Night of the Long Knives. [2]