Cambridge IGSCE History - Core content: Option B Topic 5
How effectively did the USA contain the spread of Communism?
Focus Points
This Key Question will be explored through case studies of the following:
• America and events in Cuba, 1959–62
• American involvement in Vietnam.
Specified Content
• events of the Cold War:
o American reactions to the Cuban revolution, including the missile crisis and its aftermath
o American involvement in the Vietnam War.
Listen to Revision Audio for Cuba and Vietnam by Mr Allsop
How effectively did the USA contain the spread of Communism?
Focus Points
This Key Question will be explored through case studies of the following:
• America and events in Cuba, 1959–62
• American involvement in Vietnam.
Specified Content
• events of the Cold War:
o American reactions to the Cuban revolution, including the missile crisis and its aftermath
o American involvement in the Vietnam War.
Listen to Revision Audio for Cuba and Vietnam by Mr Allsop
Past Questions on Cuban Missile Crisis
Describe how relations between the USA and Cuba became worse when Castro took power.
Describe the immediate impact on US–Cuban
relations (up to Jan 1961) of Castro coming to power.
Describe the response of the USA to Castros takeover of Cuba.
Describe relations between the USA
and Cuba from 1959 to the Bay of Pigs invasion of 1961.
It was tense as the American-backed
ruler Batista was overthrown by Castro, a communist. Kennedy was
humiliated. Kennedy feared other countries becoming Communist (Domino Theory).
Castro took over some American businesses in
Cuba, especially agricultural businesses. He
took their land and distributed it to his
supporters among Cubas peasant population.
It was hostile but there was no
direct confrontation. USA was unwilling to get directly involved even when
Castro took over American owned companies and land. USA refused to buy Cuban
sugar from July 1960 and in October 1960 all trade with Cuba was ended.
In 1961, USA broke off diplomatic
relations with Cuba as it was unable to tolerate Soviet influence so close.
USA was determined to remove Castro
and to starve Castro into submission. In April 1961 The US supported a direct
invasion – the Bay of Pigs.
Kennedy supported thousands of Cuban exiles in USA who
tried to overthrow Castro at the Bay of Pigs.
Describe the Bay of Pigs incident.
The USA decided to support an invasion by those
Cuban exiles forced out by Castro to overthrow Castro. The exiles received training and weapons from
the CIA.
Rather than a direct invasion, Kennedy supplied
arms, equipment and transport for 1400 anti–Castro exiles to invade Cuba and
overthrow him. In April 1961 the exiles landed at the Bay of Pigs and were
defeated by 20,000 Cuban troops. It failed disastrously.
There was no popular uprising and the exiles
were easily killed or captured by the larger Cuban forces.
Although not directly implicated, Kennedy was
humiliated.
Why did the Bay of Pigs invasion take place in April 1961?
Large numbers
of Cubans, who supported Batista, fled from Cuba when Castro took control.
These exiles hoped to return and therefore they put pressure on the US
government to help them.
The USA did not like Castro, who
had been a close ally of the Soviets.
The USA wanted to help Cuban exiles
who demanded action.
In 1960, Castro allied himself with
the USSR. Khrushchev signed a trade agreement giving Cuba $100 million in
economic aid. This annoyed the US government. Later Castro started to receive
arms from the USSR.
Kennedy was not prepared to
tolerate a Soviet satellite in the USAs sphere of influence.
Castro took over many US businesses
and distributed land to Cuban peasants.
USA wanted to overthrow Castro
because of his communist beliefs, and, therefore the CIA was authorised to investigate
ways to remove Castro.
Pressure groups found support from
the American media, who produced a relentless stream
of criticism of the Castro regime.
This influenced government.
Why was the Bay of Pigs invasion a failure for the USA?
Why did the Bay of Pigs (April 1961) invasion
result in humiliation for Kennedy?
It was badly planned and Kennedy
was wrongly advised.
The expected popular uprising of
Cubans to support the exiles did not happen, as the CIA had underestimated the
popularity of Castro. The exiles were defeated and the invasion was a
humiliation. Kennedy misjudged Castros defences completely and appeared weak to
Khrushchev.
The 1400 exiles landed in Cuba were
outnumbered by 20,000 Cuban troops, with modern arms, and were killed or
captured. This made Castro more popular in Cuba.
Even though Kennedy claimed there
was no direct American government involvement in the invasion, Castro and
Khrushchev knew that it had been planned by the CIA. Kennedy had been
humiliated.
The invasion convinced Castro that
the USA was an enemy and he looked more to the USSR for protection.
It suggested to the USSR that Kennedy was weak.
It also made Castro and Khrushchev very suspicious of US policy. In the end,
communist Cuba drew closer to the USSR.
The half-hearted invasion suggested to Cuba and
the USSR that, despite its opposition to
Communism in Cuba, the USA was unwilling to get
directly involved in Cuba.
Khrushchev was scornful of Kennedys pathetic
attempt in Cuba.
Why did the Soviet Union place missiles on Cuba?
To defend and give support to Cuba. To bargain with the USA. To defend and extend communism.
To test the will of Kennedy. To gain the upper hand in the arms race.
Following the Bay of Pigs incident, Castro felt
he required more support against possible American attacks.
Khrushchev wanted to bargain with the USA. If he
had missiles in Cuba he could
agree to remove them if the USA removed their
missiles from Turkey.
In the context of Cold War, Khrushchev was testing
the new President and how strong USA was.
Khrushchev was so concerned about the missile
gap between the USSR and the
USA that he would take every opportunity to
close it.
Following the Bay of Pigs incident, Khrushchev
was genuinely defending communism in Cuba.
Why did the Cuban Missile Crisis
cause so much alarm?
Why was the USA concerned about Soviet missiles
in Cuba?
Russian missiles were close and
therefore a threat to the USA and her supremacy in the arms race.
A nuclear attack could be imminent.
There
was a threat to world peace. It
gave strength to Cuba.
It was a challenge to Kennedy. It
was a threat to world peace. Communism
could spread.
If the bases became operational
much of the USA would be brought in range of a Soviet missile attack.
It increased the fear of the spread
of Communism in the region where Cuba had already become Communist.
It seemed that Khrushchev was
gaining the upper hand being so close and that the missile gap was closing.
The USSR wanted bargaining power to
get the USA to remove its missiles from Turkey.
In the context of Cold War America was
concerned that the USSR was trying to draw them into nuclear war.
Cuba was gaining in USSR military strength in
Americas backyard and they were concerned about the USSR putting missiles on
Cuba.
Khrushchev wanted to test the USA to see how
strong they really were. USSR wanted the missiles as bargaining power to get
the USA to remove its missiles from Turkey.
There was potential for a war and for over a
week the world was on the brink of nuclear war.
8-mark questions
Khrushchev gained a victory in the Cuban Missile Crisis.
How far do you agree?
The Cuban Missile Crisis was a success for the US policy of
containment. How far do you agree?
Which leader, Kennedy or
Khrushchev, handled the Cuban Missile Crisis better? Explain your answer
Khrushchev handled the Cuban Crisis better than
Kennedy. How far do you agree?
Khrushchev claimed that the Cuban Missile
Crisis was a victory for the Soviet Union.
The USA gained more than the USSR from the Cuban
Missile Crisis. How far do you agree?
USA victory:
The USA avoided a nuclear war.
The USA had remained superior in the nuclear
arms race.
The direct threat of Soviet missiles and Soviet
influence was removed from Cuba. Nuclear weapons were removed from USAs doorstep
and, therefore, removed the danger from a nuclear attack on major cities.
Kennedy had shown Khrushchev that he would not
accept the expansion of direct Soviet military action and influence near the
USA.
Kennedy increased his reputation at home and
worldwide by avoiding war and forcing Khrushchev to back down. This was the
beginning of Khrushchevs fall from power, but it also made Soviet leaders wary of
their actions which might offend the USA.
The crisis damaged Khrushchevs
prestige. Some leading Soviet politicians were angry that their country had
been forced to back down. They played a significant part in Khrushchevs defeat
by his opponents in 1964.
Kennedys reputation rise
tremendously in USA and throughout the West. He had stood up to Khrushchev and
forced him to back down and his decisive action removed the threat of a nuclear
base in Cuba.
Communist victory:
Khrushchev ended the crisis and
became the peacemaker who was willing to make the first move to compromise.
Cuba remained a Communist state despite the
removal of missiles. USAs containment policy failed in Cuba, and later other
communist groups appeared in Central America, such as Nicaragua and El
Salvador.
The Soviets maintained significant influence on
Cuba. Cuba remained a strong ally of USSR and could depend on it for protection
and aid.
The price the USA had to pay for the removal of
Soviet missiles was the removal of US missiles in Turkey.
Both:
Both sides came to agreements to
keep peace and avoid a nuclear war.
Both sides realised the danger of a
nuclear war and were willing to compromise to avoid it.
It was agreed to set up a hot line
between Washington and Moscow to enable direct communication to take place. In
1963 a Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was signed.
The Cuban Missile Crisis was never a threat to world peace. How far do you
agree?
Yes it was as everybody was worried
what might happen. The missiles were
just for protection.
Behind the scenes neither leader wanted
war. Neither leader wanted to lose face.
Advisers were recommending war.
If as he stated, Khrushchev wanted
just to protect Cuba following the Bay of Pigs incident, then it might be
argued that he did not intend war.
Khrushchev was not impressed with
the advice from Castro about getting in the first strike and instead wrote an
urgent letter to Kennedy.
Kennedy bought time in delaying his
reply to the first letter in the hope that any war could be
avoided and the Russians would back
down.
Quietly the USA agreed that they
would remove their missiles in Turkey to avoid conflict. The Americans wanted
the warheads on Cuba to be dismantled immediately or else they would attack
Cuba. At this stage there was a real fear of a nuclear war starting. Castro actually
suggested that Khrushchev should get in the first strike.
Following the first letter from
Khrushchev the Americans did not know what to do. The military leaders
recommended an immediate air attack on Cuba and Robert Kennedy gave the Soviet
Ambassador an ultimatum that if the missiles were not removed the US would attack
Cuba. Both leaders realised how close to war they had come. To prevent such as
crisis again they set up a direct telephone hot line.
Past Questions on Vietnam War
What was the Domino Theory?
It was something the Americans
believed. It was related to the USAs
Cold War containment policy.
The Americans believed that if one country
in South East Asia turned communist all the
others would fall to communism, one
after another, like a row of dominoes. (2)
They were afraid that if communists
took over South Vietnam, communism would go on to take over the world. In
addition to Vietnam, the countries under threat were Laos, Cambodia, Thailand,
Malaya, Indonesia.
Who were the Vietcong?
The National Liberation Front -
North Vietnamese communists under Ho Chi Minh, as well as opponents of the South
Vietnamese government.
They fought against both the South
Vietnam government and the American armed forces between 1959-75. Initially a
group of communist guerrilla fighters, it increased in numbers over the course
of the conflict.
They were backed by the USSR and
China.
They had the support of the peasants
as they treated them well.
What was the Ho Chi Minh Trail?
- A route named after the leader of North
Vietnam.
- A supply link route between North and South
Vietnam, passing through Laos and Cambodia.
- A network of jungle tracks for bicycles,
trucks and tanks.
- It was used to move troops from North Vietnam
after 1964.
Why did the USA get involved in the
war in Vietnam?
After the Second World War the USA feared the expansion of communism
across Europe and Asia. They believed the future of US prosperity and democracy
was at risk if communism was allowed to spread.
In 1954 the French were driven from
their colony and the US feared that communism would spread.
Communism was spreading and by 1956
the Soviet Union, China, eastern Europe
and North Korea all had communist governments. Americans felt increasingly
threatened by the spread of communism.
This fear was based on the “domino theory” where if one country became
communist others would follow. If South
Vietnam fell it would be followed by Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Burma, India
and Pakistan.
Because of the Tonkin incident, in
1964 the North Vietnamese opened fire on the US navy and the US Congress gave
the new President, Johnson, the necessary powers to deal with the problem.
Why did the USA find it impossible to defeat the Vietcong?
Why did the Vietnam War become
increasingly unpopular with the
people of America?
The USA was unsuccessful in Vietnam because of the oppositions use of guerrilla tactics.
8-Mark questions for Vietnam
How far can the American withdrawal
from Vietnam be blamed on military
failure?
How far was the US public opinion the most important reason for Americas withdrawal
from Vietnam?
Difficulty
terrain + Guerrilla + Military failure
American forces were no match for
the Vietcong in guerrilla tactics. The principles were simple. Retreat when the
enemy attacks, raid when the enemy camps, attack when the enemy tires and
pursue when the enemy retreats. The tactics were a nightmare. Guerrillas had no
uniform and no base camps / headquarters. They were hard to tell from the
peasants in the villages. They attacked and then disappeared into the jungle. They came out of the jungle
and carried out acts of sabotage or sudden ambushes or booby traps. Their aim was
to wear down the enemy soldiers and reduce morale. US soldiers lived in
constant fear of attack.
The Americans were unable to distinguish between
villagers and Vietcong members.
Guerrilla tactics brought low
morale.
In the jungle, the Vietcong built extensive
networks of underground tunnels with storehouses, workshops, kitchens
and hospitals. These were very difficult to find and destroy.
The difficulty of the terrain meant young
American soldiers could not get used to fighting in a foreign jungle.
The guerrillas merged with the people
and the jungle. American soldiers were inexperienced and unable to cope with
guerrilla warfare because it was different to what they were used to.
Strength
of Vietcong
The Vietcong were fighting in their own country.
They knew their own terrain well
The Vietcong continued to receive supplies from
North Vietnam and China down the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
They had the support of many Vietnamese people and
were easily absorbed back into village life.
Vietcong were backed by USSR & China.
The Vietcong bases were well hidden
in extensive underground bunkers making it very difficult to destroy.
Weakness
of the American troops
American troops had low morale. The
average age was nineteen and inexperienced. They became frustrated at not being
able to fight back and were frightened in such a hostile country.
Loss
of Moral Support at home + the impact of the media
The Media had a significant impact. As the War was the
first televised war, American public became aware of what was happening.
Americans realized the stark reality
of war and were horrified at the barbaric nature of
American attacks. It showed children being burned by napalm and villages massacred e.g. My Lai.
US atrocities in the use of horrific weapons such as napalm
against civilians and the use of chemical defoliants which destroyed
vegetation, polluted the land and poisoned people and this horrified people.
The Americans lost support at home
when it became clear after the Tet Offensive that the USA could not win the war and started to use unconventional
tactics.
Public opinion was changing. The war was very costly in terms of
military supplies and yet the Tet Offensive proved Vietcong could still attack
Saigon.
As more and more soldiers returned
in body bags or were
considered to be on drugs,
public opinion turned.
It led to open criticism of Johnson
– “Hey, Hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today”.
The USA had no support of the Vietnamese peasants. They generally viewed
the Americans as invaders and chose to support the Vietcong who offered to
improve their lives.
Johnson had to change the policy
after the Tet Offensive as he realised war could not be won militarily. Policy
of Vietnamisation was
adopted.
The human and economic cost was too high
Casualties were high. Over 50,000
troops were to lose their lives. By 1968, 300 were dying each week. Most
Americans knew a relative or friend who had died.
The economic cost of war was high.
By 1968 the war costed $30,000 million a year. This meant cutbacks at home on
spending on social reform. The cost was highlighted by the Tet
Offensive. There were 500,000 troops in Vietnam and America was spending $20-30
billion a year yet little impression was made and the Vietcong were able to
launch major offensives. This huge spending meant cutbacks in spending on
social reform.
In 1967 Life Magazine calculated it
cost $400,000 for each Vietcong guerrilla killed.